On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 08:07 +0200, Walter Saegesser wrote: > The concept of many people writing the documentation is welcome. But > there should or maybe even must be a supervisor, who approves or > disapproves the information given. Otherwise I fear that people will > sooner or later realize they cannot rely on the Wiki. Either they > don't > find what they are looking for or they find that what they find they > better had not found ...
This is a good point. I'd be happy to act as such a supervisor. As the project manager for lwIP I should oversee the documentation as much as the source code. wikia already send me updates to highlight changes to the wiki, which I do my best to check for vandalism, but if anyone is making changes and they'd like to have them reviewed because they're not sure about them I'd be happy to help. Even if you can only annotate things like netconn_new_with_proto_and_callback with the questions that you're not sure about it would be very helpful; it's much easier to answer a question and fill in the missing bits than write a document from scratch. Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
