I've spoken too early!
 
when I set  LWIP_HTTPD_SSI and LWIP_HTTPD_CGI to 1, I ha ve the same problem 
than before...

--- Gio 7/7/11, rocco brandi <vicci...@yahoo.it> ha scritto:


Da: rocco brandi <vicci...@yahoo.it>
Oggetto: Re: [lwip-users] problem with web page with frames
A: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <lwip-users@nongnu.org>
Data: Giovedì 7 luglio 2011, 10:44







thanks Simon
 
when I define HTTP_IS_DATA_VOLATILE(hs) to 1 it works, but the checksums is 
disable. so the problem seems to be in a wrong checksums. what I have to check?
 
Rocco

--- Mer 6/7/11, goldsi...@gmx.de <goldsi...@gmx.de> ha scritto:


Da: goldsi...@gmx.de <goldsi...@gmx.de>
Oggetto: Re: [lwip-users] problem with web page with frames
A: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <lwip-users@nongnu.org>
Data: Mercoledì 6 luglio 2011, 22:01


rocco brandi wrote: 




Simon, I'm terribly sorry for the pcap, I don't know why wireshark ignored the 
filter when I saved it m(_ _)m

I'm not sure that the problem relies on lwip port, since with previous version 
of httpd everything work fine (at least with page without frames)
It still seems like an issue in your port as normally, application changes 
should not lead to invalid checksums or even skipped TCP segno's. You could try 
to define HTTP_IS_DATA_VOLATILE(hs) to 1 so that data is always copied in to 
PBUF_RAM pbufs for sending. But while (invalidly) using no-copy might lead to 
invalid checksums, skipped segno's should be totally independent of this 
setting (since TCP headers are always saved in PBUF_RAM pbufs).

Simon

-----Segue allegato-----


_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
-----Segue allegato-----


_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to