Simon wrote: > Mason wrote: > >> I'm using OS21 (STMicro) and I've decided to use a mutex. >> >> Is it correct that, in my case, I can ignore the sys_prot_t arguments? > > Yes, mapping sys_arch_protect/unprotect to mutex_lock/unlock is correct.
And when mapping to a mutex, may one ignore 1) the return value of sys_arch_protect 2) the pval parameter of sys_arch_unprotect _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users