I had given libcoap a quick look over the weekend!

It seemed like the best choice as a starting place. My biggest concern was I 
need an lwip raw API implementation, and a minimal memory footprint version. 

I'd be happy to help - tell me what you need from me. Feel free to email 
directly: m...@squareconnect.com. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 14, 2013, at 2:40 PM, chrysn <chr...@fsfe.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:21:58AM -0800, mat henshall wrote:
>> I have just been doing the same search - and evaluating coap as an option
>> in one of our projects.
> 
> my first approach would be to port libcoap[1] to lwip -- as it already
> has several ifdef'd "posix or contiki (uip)" distinctions, i figure the
> places where porting has to be done should be easy to find.
> 
> i'd plan on some initial porting this evening. if you'd help with
> porting and/or testing, i think we could get something solid to propose
> to the libcoap people for inclusion.
> 
> they don't seem to have a mailing list, but i'm confident they can be
> reached :-)
> 
> best regards
> chrysn
> 
> [1] http://libcoap.sourceforge.net/
> 
> -- 
> To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
>  -- Bene Gesserit axiom
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> lwip-users@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to