On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Peter LM <[email protected]> wrote:

> I read something about NOCOPY during netconn-write(), and in the contrib
> example the flag NOCOPY was used therefore I did the same. But It is
> correctl running with the flag NETCON_COPY instead of NETCONN_NOCOPY !!
> Obviously I would prefer to use NOCOPY since I only send "read-only data"
> with the view to improve execution time and memory usage...


What you mean by read only data? It must be at least:
- directly adressible (flash or RAM in MCU),
- accesible by drivers DMA (for example Core Coupled RAM on STM32F4 cannot
be used).

Regards,
Krzysztof Wesołowski
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to