Joel Cunningham wrote: > 1) Should SYS_ARCH_PROTECT() do more than just disable interrupts? Something > that would act as a critical section in the case where a context switch > happens?
Up to now, it should block task switching too, I guess. Although this is not cleanly documented, it's just expected. However, I think by now it would be better to not make that assumption, so could you please file a bug report including your fix? (Or do we already have one? I can't remember) > 2) Is it assumed that calling sys_sem_signal() will not cause a voluntary > context switch? Right now, that's what is assumed, yes. Simon _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
