On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 20:02 +0100, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote: > Freddie Chopin wrote: > > But what difference in reception does it make - in both cases > > (with/without delay) the netconns are closed and deleted anyway. > > What you might be mising is that the netconn can be deleted with the > pcb > being still alive?
I know that and in both cases the PCB stays active. But in case nr 1 it quickly goes into TIME_WAIT state while in case nr 2 it says in FIN_WAIT_1 forever... As if trying to establish a new netconn (which fails at "netconn_bind()", after which it is closed and deleted) somehow locked further transfers to/from that active PCB... I would expect that in each case the PCB would finally go into TIME_WAIT soon, but it does not happen without the delay of thread... I'm just trying to understand it (; Regards, FCh _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
