Well, yeah I didn't mean I fixed the fragmentation problem, I just
avoided it. :) Maybe I will try to set MTU to 1500 just to see what is
happening.
Thanks!
On 8.3.2017 17:36, goldsimom wrote:
For your MTU, 1446 is correct. I'd rather fix the MTU to be 1500 though.
And you don't fix the fragmentation problem. I think this is fixed in
2.0.0 though.
Simonl)
Am 8. März 2017 12:09:24 MEZ schrieb pekez <nenad.pe...@rt-rk.com>:
Well, just maybe I have succeeded to find the solution to this
problem... However, since I don't know exactly how TCP works under
the hood, maybe I could cause some other problems, but for now
it's working. Nevertheless, I decided to reduce TCP MSS from 1460
to 1446, and ip_frag() is not called any more at all. At least,
not so far, I have been testing the whole night, so that's good
starting point.
I would be grateful if someone could explain me whether this
change is valid, I mean, if that's not something I should be
changing (reducing) for some reason?
On 6.3.2017 11:09, pekez wrote:
I forgot to mention that I use Xilinx lwIP example applications
(XAPP 1026
<https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/application_notes/xapp1026.pdf>).
Basically the only thing I have changed is in their TCP server
app, instead of only receiving data, I made server only to send
data (literally, instead of lwip_recv, I put lwip_send).
Also, I don't know whether this means anything, but bug
reproduction is kinda interesting. I am always able to bring up
TCP client several consecutive times and successfully exchange
data (ip_frag never gets called during the exchange) and close
TCP client. Then I don't do anything for about 5-10 minutes. Then
I bring up TCP client again, and TCP server get stuck in
ip_frag() when start sending data.
On 6.3.2017 10:57, pekez wrote:
1) netif->mtu = XEMACPS_MTU - XEMACPS_HDR_SIZE;
#define XEMACPS_MTU 1500U /* max MTU size of
Ethernet frame */
#define XEMACPS_HDR_SIZE 14U /* size of Ethernet
header */
2) how can I check exact length of pbufs?
3) Yep, IP_FRAG_USES_STATIC_BUF and LWIP_NETIF_TX_SINGLE_PBUF
are both 0.
Thanks!
On 6.3.2017 10:51, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
pekez wrote:
Anyone? Not a single person can tell me something about this
problem?
Does not seem so.
Could you give us more info:
- what is netif->mtu set to
- exact length of pbufs in a chaing > 1480
- setting of IP_FRAG_USES_STATIC_BUF and
LWIP_NETIF_TX_SINGLE_PBUF (I assume both are 0 - default)
That way I could try to have a quick look.
Simon
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
