Marco Jakobs wrote:
> It's not that easy as we are using NAT which needs to be modified as some 
> structures seems to have changed between LwIP 1.4.1 and 2.0.2.

Oh, yeah. Well, NAT should not be *that* different from any callback API 
application...?

> I wanted to test the difference, but after >100 compile errors I gave up for 
> a "quick shot".

That pretty much looks like you are accessing things that aren't meant as 
public API. We pretty much tried to keep changes to the public API as minimal 
as possible.


Simon

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to