Did anyone have a problem or could check how the https(mbedtls) server
works when receiving data volumes larger than TCP_WND?

>I noticed that this is not a POST MANUAL WND problem but a general
>problem with receiving more data (both GET and POST).
>As I increased TCP WND from
>#define TCP_WND (2 * TCP_MSS)
>to
>#define TCP_WND (8 * TCP_MSS)
>I can receive more data before the problem occurs. But the problem
>still occurs when I want to send a larger file, it looks like the
>automatic TCP_WND control does not work for https. I attach

> I noticed that this is not a POST MANUAL WND problem but a general
> problem with receiving more data (both GET and POST).
> As I increased TCP WND from
> #define TCP_WND (2 * TCP_MSS)
> to
> #define TCP_WND (8 * TCP_MSS)
> I can receive more data before the problem occurs. But the problem
> still occurs when I want to send a larger file, it looks like the
> automatic TCP_WND control does not work for https. I attach the
> screenshot from wireshark as it looks.
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6fxdAbp613KeTV2Z05rU2xNSUZoOEF2MF9xTWMxdHVJZUE4



-- 
regards
tomek

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to