On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:11 PM Simon Goldschmidt <goldsi...@gmx.de> wrote: > You're mixing link state with admin state here. That might work, but > might not work in some situations. It's not so clear to me. Which pattern should I adopt to keep the link status under control? What do you mean by 'admin state'? How should the admin state be affected by the link state?
> > Then when the link goes down while > > err = netconn_recv(conn, &buf); > > is waiting, it doesn't exit with an error. Is that correct? > Correct or not depends on how you define it. There's currently no code When you say "depends on how you define it.", what are you talking about? > in lwIP to unblock on link loss. That could only work if you're bound to > a netif. I'm not sure if what you think of works in other stacks. What other stacks? Stacks other than lwip? best regards Max -- Et nunc, auxilium solis, vincam! Oppugnatio solaris! VIS! Massimiliano Cialdi cia...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
