Hi Brinda, Thank you for the information. See my reply inline.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Brinda M. C <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > As part of a project on building a network monitoring and management based > on SNMP for 6LoWPAN/RPL WSNs, we have developed a light-weight SNMPv1 agent > which, according to our knowledge, occupies far less text program memory > than the existing implementations. Our implementation occupies a memory > footprint of just 4KB of text program memory on TelosB motes. Our > performance test results showed that our implementation also brings down > computational overheads substantially. > > We tested our SNMPv1 agent implementation on both TinyOS-2.x and Contiki OS > running 6LoWPAN/RPL protocol stack. We also encountered this issue on the mote. Given the fact of the existing protocol stacks, have you managed to fix both your uSNMP codes and the existing BLIP inside of the node? > > The motivation for our work comes from the fact that the memory footprint of > 6LoWPAN/RPL and the related protocols is ever increasing and and our belief > that there is a need to optimize our implementation so that we should be > able to monitor any operational network comprising of resource constrained > devices with limited memory. Limited resource will hurt all applications including SNMP. SO basically I think the optimization of the existing codes is also important to make the world a better one :) > > I would be more than happy to share the approach we followed while building > our light weight SNMPv1 (we call it uSNMP) and provide a generic guidelines > to those who want to realise the same using their own implementation > methods. You are welcome to contact me for the source code as your feedback > will be very useful. Thank you. Could you hack an Individual Draft on the topic to describe what kind of problems you had met and conquered? I think that's a better way of communication. > > In this context, I would like to know if we can submit a document based on > our work to the lwip charter so that it can be included in an appropriate > Internet draft. Sure. You are very welcome! > > Regards > Brinda > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip -- Best regards, Zhen _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
