I support adoption as a WG document. This is indeed exactly the type of document needed as a common reference for Lwig. Maybe a next version could explain me the Lwig/Lwip name duality ;-)
Esko Dijk -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cao Zhen (CZ) Sent: Tuesday 5 February 2013 4:27 To: [email protected] Subject: [Lwip] Call for adoption of the lwig-terminology draft Dear All, At Atlanta, we discussed the lwig terminology draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-lwig-terms-00.txt), which is short but immediate catch of the terminologies used in IETF works on lightweight protocols. We have discussed with area directors about adding this to the mile stones of the working group. As its characteristics, we would like to push the document forward to make it officially referable to the industrial. This message starts a one-week call for adoption of this document. Please feedback your opinion before Next Tuesday. Thank you very much -Zhen & Robert _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
