Hi All, The WGLC has been closed. We received several good review from security experts.
@Authors, could you update the document with the discussion (I notice there are some places in your discussion). And we can move forward to IESG. Many thanks -z > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cao > Zhen (CZ) > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 8:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [Lwip] WGLC for I-D draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-01.txt > > hi ALL > > We received very positive support for this draft to move forward. > > This message starts a two-week WGLC for this document. If you have any > comments or suggestions, > please feedback within the timeline. > > And I believe Vancouver meeting is a good venue for f2f discussion if needed. > > Thanks and Best regards, > Zhen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > > Of [email protected] > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 8:35 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: [Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-01.txt > > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Light-Weight Implementation Guidance > > Working Group of the IETF. > > > > Title : Minimal IKEv2 > > Author(s) : Tero Kivinen > > Filename : draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-01.txt > > Pages : 44 > > Date : 2013-10-17 > > > > Abstract: > > This document describes minimal version of the Internet Key Exchange > > version 2 (IKEv2) protocol. IKEv2 is a component of IPsec used for > > performing mutual authentication and establishing and maintaining > > Security Associations (SAs). IKEv2 includes several optional > > features, which are not needed in minimal implementations. This > > document describes what is required from the minimal implementation, > > and also describes various optimizations which can be done. The > > protocol described here is compliant with full IKEv2 with exception > > that this document describes mainly shared secret authentication > > (IKEv2 requires support for certificate authentication in addition to > > shared secret authentication). > > > > This document does not update or modify RFC 5996, but provides more > > compact description of the minimal version of the protocol. If this > > document and RFC 5996 conflicts then RFC 5996 is the authoritative > > description. > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal > > > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-01 > > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-01 > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > > tools.ietf.org. > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lwip mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
