Sure.  We started that discussion a few IETFs ago and have a bis draft out at
draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis.

(I’m not sure that I will be in Chicago, but I could join from remote.)

One thing that needs to be added before even discussing these device classes is 
the difference between micro controllers (which you have been calling M-class) 
and general purpose computing platforms (A-class).  Proposed text for that 
should be in the next version of 7228bis.

Grüße, Carsten


> On 25 Jan 2017, at 23:12, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7228#section-3 defines these three
> classes of IoT devices:
> 
>     +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
>     | Name        | data size (e.g., RAM) | code size (e.g., Flash) |
>     +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
>     | Class 0, C0 | << 10 KiB             | << 100 KiB              |
>     |             |                       |                         |
>     | Class 1, C1 | ~ 10 KiB              | ~ 100 KiB               |
>     |             |                       |                         |
>     | Class 2, C2 | ~ 50 KiB              | ~ 250 KiB               |
>     +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
> 
> Is there an interest to get together at the next IETF meeting and to
> talk about re-working on these classes and to provide more details about
> the functionality that is included in this calculation based on ongoing
> implementation work?
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

Reply via email to