Hi Carles, Thanks for confirming.
Regards, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]> > Sent: 30 October 2020 07:50 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> > Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node- > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Zhen Cao > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp- > constrained-node-networks-11: (with COMMENT) > > Hi Robert, > > Thank you very much for your review! > > We just submitted revision -12, which aims at addressing the comments > received from the IESG and related reviewers: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks- > 12 > > Please find below our inline responses: > > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss- > criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node- > networks/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for this document. It is somewhat outside my area of > expertise, > > but > > I do not see any network management related issues. > > > > One minor comment: > > > > 3.2. Usage scenarios > > > > There are different deployment and usage scenarios for CNNs. > Some > > CNNs follow the star topology, whereby one or several hosts are > > linked to a central device that acts as a router connecting the > CNN > > to the Internet. CNNs may also follow the multihop topology > > [RFC6606]. > > > > Perhaps: "Alternatively, CNNs may also follow ... ", otherwise it feels > > like > > this paragraph stops quite abruptly, whereas from the first couple of > > sentences > > I was expecting it to say a bit more about the different deployment > > scenarios. > > We applied your suggested change. > > Thanks, > > Carles (on behalf of the authors) > > > > Regards, > > Rob > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
