On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 6:12 AM Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-19: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> So this is process violation discuss. This document is up for approval as
> standards track. However, there are no evidence that it was ever IETF last
> called for standards track. I only find evidence for a IETF last call intended
> for informational on 2020-08-25.
>
> I have not reviewed the content of document yet. I would propose that the
> responsible AD pulls this document from this telechat and then performs the
> IETF last call before it gets scheduled again.
Argh, I completely missed that the intended status had been changed on
draft 14 from the LC (draft 12).
2020-11-18 14 Mohit Sethi Changing to proposed standard as
requested by the COSE experts.
2020-11-18 14 Mohit Sethi Intended Status changed to Proposed
Standard from Informational
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
