Dear chairs,
hi list,
1. absolutely
2. absolutely
3. absolutely
And to give an indication why, please compare:
Section 3.1 relates to:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-suit-manifest/
Section 3.2 relates to:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-ar4si/
Section 3.3 relates to:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-architecture/
And all these sections listed above need some fleshing out.
Additionally,
The Section 4.4 on time-keeping relates to:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rats-architecture-18.html#name-appendix-a-time-considerati
and could become useful terminology when specifying green technology (or
fresh remote attestation evidence).
Count me in.
Viele Grüße,
Henk
On 29.05.22 06:46, Mohit Sethi wrote:
Dear all:
This is a call for adoption of draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis) as a
LWIG working group item. Please respond to this call and answer the
following questions by 13th June, 2022:
1. Do you think this draft should be an LWIG working group Item?
2. Would you contribute by reviewing this document?
3. Would you contribute text to this document?
Please also let us know if you have objections/concerns regarding the
adoption of this draft as a working group item.
Zhen and Mohit
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
