Quoting Tycho Andersen (tycho.ander...@canonical.com): > We've already checked that c is not null above, so the false branch can never > be taken here. > > Reported-by: Coverity > Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho.ander...@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com> > --- > src/lxc/lxccontainer.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c > index 0218e57..5b96b8c 100644 > --- a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c > +++ b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c > @@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_createl(struct lxc_container *c, > const char *t, > return false; > > struct lxc_conf *old = current_config; > - current_config = c ? c->lxc_conf : NULL; > + current_config = c->lxc_conf; > > /* > * since we're going to wait for create to finish, I don't think we > -- > 2.1.4 > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-devel mailing list > lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
