Ignore.

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:57:24AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> If lxc_container_new() fails we check for ENOMEM and if so goto out. If ENOMEM
> is not set we will simply continue. The same goes for the call to regcomp() 
> but
> instead of checking for ENOMEM we need to check for REG_ESPACE.
> 
> Tweaking: Since lxc-ls might have to gather a lot of containers and I don't
> know if compilers will always optimize this let's move *some* variable
> declarations outside of the loop when it does not hinder readability
> 
> Set ls_nesting to 0 initially. Otherwise users will always see nested
> containers printed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brau...@mailbox.org>
> ---
>  src/lxc/lxc_ls.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_ls.c b/src/lxc/lxc_ls.c
> index a4ab9b6..31279fb 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_ls.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_ls.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Options :\n\
>    -g --groups        comma separated list of groups a container must have to 
> be displayed\n",
>       .options = my_longopts,
>       .parser = my_parser,
> -     .ls_nesting = MAX_NESTLVL,
> +     .ls_nesting = 0,
>  };
>  
>  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>       if (lvl > args->ls_nesting)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     int num = 0, ret = -1;
> +     int ret = -1;
>       char **containers = NULL;
>       /* If we, at some level of nesting, encounter a stopped container but
>        * want to retrieve nested containers we need to build an absolute path
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>       if (!dir_exists(path))
>               goto out;
>  
> +     int num = 0;
>       /* Do not do more work than is necessary right from the start. */
>       if (args->ls_active || (args->ls_active && args->ls_frozen))
>               num = list_active_containers(path, &containers, NULL);
> @@ -341,6 +342,8 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> +     char *tmp = NULL;
> +     int check;
>       struct ls *l = NULL;
>       struct lxc_container *c = NULL;
>       size_t i;
> @@ -350,17 +353,23 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>               /* Filter container names by regex the user gave us. */
>               if (args->ls_regex) {
>                       regex_t preg;
> -                     if (regcomp(&preg, args->ls_regex, REG_NOSUB | 
> REG_EXTENDED) != 0)
> +                     check = regcomp(&preg, args->ls_regex, REG_NOSUB | 
> REG_EXTENDED);
> +                     if (check == REG_ESPACE) /* we're out of memory */
> +                             goto out;
> +                     else if (check != 0)
>                               continue;
> -                     int rc = regexec(&preg, name, 0, NULL, 0);
> +                     check = regexec(&preg, name, 0, NULL, 0);
>                       regfree(&preg);
> -                     if (rc != 0)
> +                     if (check != 0)
>                               continue;
>               }
>  
> +             errno = 0;
>               c = lxc_container_new(name, path);
> -             if (!c)
> -                     continue;
> +             if ((errno == ENOMEM) && !c)
> +                     goto out;
> +             else if (!c)
> +                     continue;
>  
>               if (!c->is_defined(c))
>                       goto put_and_next;
> @@ -390,8 +399,10 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>  
>               /* Now it makes sense to allocate memory. */
>               l = ls_new(m, size);
> -             if (!l)
> +             if (!l) {
> +                     free(grp_tmp);
>                       goto put_and_next;
> +             }
>  
>               /* How deeply nested are we? */
>               l->nestlvl = lvl;
> @@ -422,7 +433,7 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>                       if (!l->state)
>                               goto put_and_next;
>  
> -                     char *tmp = ls_get_config_item(c, "lxc.start.auto", 
> running);
> +                     tmp = ls_get_config_item(c, "lxc.start.auto", running);
>                       if (tmp)
>                               l->autostart = atoi(tmp);
>                       free(tmp);
> @@ -451,11 +462,9 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>                * all other information we need. */
>               if (args->ls_nesting && running) {
>                       struct wrapargs wargs = (struct wrapargs){.args = NULL};
> -
> -                     /* Open a socket so that the child can communicate with
> -                      * us. */
> -                     int ret = socketpair(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM | 
> SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0, wargs.pipefd);
> -                     if (ret == -1)
> +                     /* Open a socket so that the child can communicate with 
> us. */
> +                     check = socketpair(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM | 
> SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0, wargs.pipefd);
> +                     if (check == -1)
>                               goto put_and_next;
>  
>                       /* Set the next nesting level. */
> @@ -472,12 +481,12 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>  
>                       /* fork(): Attach to the namespace of the child and run
>                        * ls_get() in it which is called in ls_get_wrapper(). 
> */
> -                     int status = c->attach(c, ls_get_wrapper, &wargs, 
> &aopt, &out);
> +                     check = c->attach(c, ls_get_wrapper, &wargs, &aopt, 
> &out);
>                       /* close the socket */
>                       close(wargs.pipefd[1]);
>  
>                       /* Retrieve all information we want from the child. */
> -                     if (status == 0)
> +                     if (check == 0)
>                               if (ls_deserialize(wargs.pipefd[0], m, size) == 
> -1)
>                                       goto put_and_next;
>  
> @@ -512,20 +521,24 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const 
> struct lxc_arguments *args,
>                       /* We want to remove all locks we created under
>                        * /run/lxc/lock so we create a string pointing us to
>                        * the lock path for the current container. */
> -                     char lock_path[MAXPATHLEN];
> -                     int ret = snprintf(lock_path, MAXPATHLEN, 
> "%s/lxc/lock/%s/%s", RUNTIME_PATH, path, name);
> -                     if (ret < 0 || ret >= MAXPATHLEN)
> +                     size_t len = strlen(path) + strlen(name) + 
> strlen(RUNTIME_PATH) + /* /+lxc+/+lock+/+/= */ 11 + 1;
> +                     char *lock_path = malloc(len);
> +                     if (!lock_path)
> +                             goto put_and_next;
> +
> +                     check = snprintf(lock_path, len, "%s/lxc/lock/%s/%s", 
> RUNTIME_PATH, path, name);
> +                     if (check < 0 || (size_t)check >= len)
>                               goto put_and_next;
>  
>                       /* Remove the lock. */
>                       lxc_rmdir_onedev(lock_path, NULL);
>  
>                       ls_get(m, size, args, lht, newpath, l->name, lvl + 1);
> +                     free(newpath);
>  
>                       /* Remove the lock. */
>                       lxc_rmdir_onedev(lock_path, NULL);
> -
> -                     free(newpath);
> +                     free(lock_path);
>               }
>  
>  put_and_next:
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 
_______________________________________________
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to