Quoting Mathias Gibbens (math...@calenhad.com): > This evening I upgraded my lxc/lxcfs install, seeing as how lxcfs > 2.0.0 was tagged earlier today. However, with the current lxcfs (2.0.0) > my unprivileged containers fail to start: > > > lxc@narya:~$ lxc-start -F -n aule.calenhad.com > > systemd 215 running in system mode. (+PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA +SYSVINIT > > +LIBCRYPTSETUP +GCRYPT +ACL +XZ -SECCOMP -APPARMOR) > > Detected virtualization 'lxc'. > > Detected architecture 'x86-64'. > > > > Welcome to Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie)! > > > > Set hostname to <aule.calenhad.com>. > > Failed to configure loopback device: Operation not supported > > Failed to install release agent, ignoring: No such file or directory > > Failed to create root cgroup hierarchy: Invalid argument > > Failed to allocate manager object: Invalid argument
... And does this still happen when you 'fix' the systemd service unit as below? > Previously I had been running lxcfs 2.0.0.beta1, which works fine. > > I am running Debian 8 (jessie) on both the host as well as in the > unprivileged containers. Current software versions are lxc 2.0.0.rc15, lxcfs > 2.0.0.beta1, cgmanager 0.37. > > Additionally, with the now-included systemd unit file in lxcfs, I receive > this error when attempting to start the service: > > > [/lib/systemd/system/lxcfs.service:11] Unknown lvalue 'Delegate' in section > > 'Service' > > Maybe this isn't supported in the version of systemd that ships in the > current stable release of Debian; I simply commented it out and then the > lxcfs service starts properly. Ugh. So debian/rules in the jessie package should sed -i '/Delegate/d' that files I guess. Would be nice if there were a nicer way to handle that. _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
