-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi Serge,
On 10/21/16 16:56, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de): >> On 10/20/2016 03:39 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:10:59PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: >>>> >>>> Following the api I am forced to use root permission or some >>>> hard-to-configure sudo constructs for monitoring. This is pretty painful. >>>> >>>> Do you think this could be improved? >>> >>> Not easily, because you won't be allowed to talk to the container control >>> socket to ask it its cgroup. >> >> I am not sure if I got this correctly, but don't you already need this >> string to talk with the container? > > lxc-cgroup talks to the container to find out the cgroup it is running in. > There could for instance be several containers called 'c1' (in different > lxcpaths), which could be running in cgroups c1, c1.0, and c1.1. And for each > controller the cgroup name could be different. Are there news about this? Monitoring is highly important in my environment. I am desperate. Regards Harri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYIWXvAAoJEAqeKp5m04HLb9wH/3yyOp+OZuyCQO1klj5jOyAl 8Ff/EIGJX+JcZktVfCA1bA7oKM9hdeqXJLT8xDiNbV0GA/B2Nsmfts/xKZcknBYs l9rIhMRhxuF1a+XgXnJ1tp++9mOPyiW2vmyzkmMDGXF0PyayY7t4X9cTFOBGUPGA cw/jAMnxY9Pc/YXJQC0nhm6Vp17TzidGW5tf5EMrMmVuR2Y7VqV+WCXhuwOhHUOE XAjTEgvvbezZbZAADKeZFzPXYUoveFm/PMMWN6VzEup0GAnPxYNW1kUXF12/zTyL m+/Oc81AUIUP4NskeNU1V/dEoersS05/uuNrLeYWgPls+3DMF43d45fjy7ZyyUQ= =tJbI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
