You mean symbolic links? I don't think so. Anyway, a *du -hs* in that folder should return the real size, including the sizes of symbolic links original files.
*Marcel Sánchez Toledano* 2014-07-17 14:19 GMT+02:00 Oliver Rath <r...@mglug.de>: > Possybly your lxc installation uses links instead of real files? > > Regards > Oliver > > > > On 17.07.2014 14:12, Marcel Sánchez Toledano wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm right now working in a project comparing SIMCTL (VNUML utility, UML) > with LxC. In VNUML the aprox. size of virtual machines filesystems located > in /usr/share/vnuml/filesystems are 2GB: > > > *marcel@ubuntu:/usr/share/vnuml/filesystems$ ls -lh * > *total 4.1G* > *-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.0G Oct 9 2013 debian5.fs* > *-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.0G Jul 3 07:52 debian6.fs* > > > And the size of a LxC rootfs is 246MB: > > [image: Imatge inserida 1] > > > How is this possible and which is the explanation of this? The > difference of sizes is huge! > > Thanks, > > *Marcel Sánchez Toledano* > > > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing > listlxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.orghttp://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users >
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
