Just out of courious, Why lua and not python?
On August 28, 2014 4:59:02 PM Stéphane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 04:22:03PM +0200, Tamas Papp wrote: > > On 08/28/2014 04:10 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Tamas Papp wrote: > >>hi All, > >> > >>Why is it not built and included in the (ppa) package? > >>What about the lua bindings? > >lxc-top is included in the daily and daily-stable-1.0 PPAs if you > >install the lua-lxc package. > > > >It's however not in the stable PPA or in the Ubuntu Archive because some > >of its dependencies aren't packaged and therefore had to be directly > >bundled within the package (which is fine for a PPA but isn't policy > >compliant with the Ubuntu archive). > > > > Does it mean it will never be in the stable ppa? The stable PPA is a clean backport of what's in the Ubuntu archive, so once we have the missing lua dependencies in Ubuntu itself and can build lua-lxc there, then it'll get into stable. I have however no idea of when that may happen, last I checked, there was just a request for package in Debian for lua getopt which when it gets done should resolve our problem. > > t > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com ---------- _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
