This is not dissing Docker but this discussion: http://www.cbronline.com/news/enterprise-it/software/containers-debunked-devops-security-and-why-containers-will-not-replace-virtual-machines-4977492?src=fridayfive1email
With the GM of Red Hat's Integrated Solutions points out the weakness in Docker's application repo model in regards to security patches being by-passed as time goes on. His statements also imply in a way (at least I read it that way) that OS containers at least give you the ability to apply security patches even if the original image author hasn't updated that image himself.
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
