thanks to both of you for chiming in. Maybe gluster got better, by my past experiences with it weren't particularly good so I'm inclined to stay away from it until at least I can find some solid demonstration of it working on ubuntu.
@Marat, re kernel code, yes, that was my conclusion also per thread on the zfs ML, and it actually doesn't matter that much, it'd still be useful to separate the rest of the configs like you said, which was my main goal. To clarify, in your setup, is the container using zfs? are you creating a dataset for /nfs and exporting that to the container? thank you, Spike On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:26 AM Fajar A. Nugraha <l...@fajar.net> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Marat Khalili <m...@rqc.ru> wrote: > > https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/nfs-ganesha > <https://launchpad.net/%7Egluster/+archive/ubuntu/nfs-ganesha> > > Disclamer: I haven't tested it. > > Yes, I found it too, but its production readiness is unclear to me. > > > Redhat says gluster and ganesha is production ready (as in, they're > selling subscription for it) > > https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage/gluster > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.2/html/administration_guide/sect-nfs#sect-NFS_Ganesha > > -- > Fajar > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users