If your goal is this it sounds like you want to lose the container portion and put the app bare-metal onto the system so it can adjust things with sysctl.
Containers aren't designed or even intended to have full host controls. Giving containers that is a bad idea. Sounds more to me like you want virtualization or bare metal app installs rather than containerization with LXC/LXD. Thomas > On May 23, 2019, at 18:41, Saint Michael <vene...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It means that the container has, or it must have all the power and rights. > It seems to be impossible to achieve that. > >> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:35 PM Andrey Repin <anrdae...@yandex.ru> wrote: >> Greetings, Saint Michael! >> >> > In my model, the host is unimportant, the container has the app, and I have >> > only one container per host. That way I can migrate the apps from server to >> > server in a few minutes. >> >> And? >> >> >> -- >> With best regards, >> Andrey Repin >> Friday, May 24, 2019 1:26:43 >> >> Sorry for my terrible english... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lxc-users mailing list >> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
