Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 16:40 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: 
>   
>> I mentioned this in an earlier posting that I was using the veth method
>> with bridges because I could NOT get macvlan to work.  Problem is that
>> the containers will come up and will talk on the network but the host
>> can not talk to any of the guest containers.  Ping doesn't work and
>> connections don't work.  Not IPv4 or IPv6.  I can connect to containers
>> from other systems (both IPv4 and IPv6) but not from the system that's
>> hosting them.  Someone suggested that the problem was an old bug that
>> they thought was fixed in more recent kernels.  But wasn't more
>> specific.
>>
>> I just recently moved several of my test containers from my Fedora 11
>> engine to a newer 64 bit Fedora 12 system.  In the process, I thought,
>> what the heck, lets give macvlan another shot, so I reconfigured a
>> couple of the containers from veth to macvlan.  Same problem.  Latest
>> kernel from Fedora and same problem.
>>     
>
> Another point on the curve.  Two containers, both on macvlan, can not
> ping each other but the other containers, on the veth bridge, on the
> same host, can ping each other and the macvlan containers.  IPtables
> firewall rules are completely flushed so it's not firewalling either.
>   
What is the link of the macvlan eth0 or br0 ?

I suspect this combination is not supported yet, you may wait for the 
2.6.33 kernel and use the "vepa" mode (lxc.network.macvlan.mode = vepa).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to