Brian K. White wrote: > Michael H. Warfield wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:37 -0500, Brian K. White wrote: >>> So my question is, is "02:x:x:x:x:x" in some way non-routable just >>> because it sets the locally-administered bit? >> I use that all the time without any problems. It may be something in >> the way their switch is set up that limits the number of mac addresses >> on that port. > > Aha. Plausible. I'll check it out. 24 hrs is still 12 hrs away... I > wonder which will be quicker, calling Verizon and actually getting > anyone who can even spell MAC or just waiting another day! :) > > Thanks much. >
In the course of talking to Verizon I discovered the off the cuff shell/awk loop I used to re-write all my config files at once had a typo and created the same exact mac in all config files. stopped all containers, wrote the intended _non_duplicate_ macs in all files and restarted all containers and everything is fine. *sigh* They were actually pretty helpful believe it or not and it only took a minute to bump past the first couple layers to get to a person whose time was more valuable for me to waste. -- bkw ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
