"Brian K. White" <br...@aljex.com> writes: > On 5/10/2010 10:48 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> >>> So why not require that rootfs is a separate filesystem, and let the >>> user deal with it by doing the necessary bind mount in the lxc >>> config? >> >> Hmm, that will break the actual user configurations. >> >> We can add a WARNING if rootfs is not a separate file system and provide >> the ability to let the user to do whatever he wants, IMO if it is well >> documented it is not a problem. > > Just putting in a hopefully unnecessary vote, if you are still deciding > what's ultimately going to be possible or impossible: > As a user, I can say I really want to continue using a shared filesystem > where the containrs roots are subdirectories on a single host filesystem.
Don't worry, nobody considered making this impossible (which would be impossible anyway :). Even breaking user configurations is undesirable, we're just exploring the design space. -- Regards, Feri. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
