On Sat 2011-04-16 (22:24), Geordy Korte wrote:

> Due to the architecter of esx it will only permit 1 mac per vswitch port.
> If they would allow more then security would be comprimised. Solution
> would be to have each lxc bound to a vnic.

I have had the same problem with lxc on ESX last week. I also thought
using separate vnics for each container would be a solution, but lxc has
a bug not giving back the interface original name to the host: eg, eth1
becomes dev3 and you cannot rename it back.

The result of this bug is: you can start a container only once, then you
have to reboot the host. This is a complete show stopper.


-- 
Ullrich Horlacher              Server- und Arbeitsplatzsysteme
Rechenzentrum                  E-Mail: [email protected]
Universitaet Stuttgart         Tel:    ++49-711-685-65868
Allmandring 30                 Fax:    ++49-711-682357
70550 Stuttgart (Germany)      WWW:    http://www.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to