Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:13 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stéphane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com> > > > > My thought (which I meant to point out in the help output) was > > that we should default to the latest LTS. lucid for now, 12.04 > > when it comes out. > > > > What do you think? > > > > If you think it's better to use the host's release by default, > > I'm fine with that. > > I kind of like having all the defaults set to what I'm currently > running.
Me too, but I had a feeling that most users would want an LTS. > One thing that bothers me is that we can't give the distro, arch, ... as > parameter when doing a lxc-create (which I'm assuming is the most common What do you mean? lxc-create -t ubuntu -f /etc/lxc.conf -n n1 -- -a i386 -r natty Is that not what you mean? > way of using our templates). > > Should we change the template to prompt the user instead? showing the > supported values for the distro and architecture (at least) and using > the current system's values as a default? By default no, but we could add a [-i|--interactive] option to the ubuntu template? -serge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic? Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
