On 10/06/2011 02:45 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Brian K. White ([email protected]):
>> Ideally, for the stated purpose, we need something not named ubuntu.
>
> I almost didn't create the page for that reason, but then decided the
> content can always get moved if/when someone gets a better domain name.
> I don't think we should hold off on collecting the information for this
> reason.  If sourceforge supported wikis (does it?) then lxc.sf.net/wiki
> would be ideal.
>
> Note for instance I also have wiki.ubuntu.com/UserNamespace - not at
> all ubuntu-specific, just a wiki page about a project ubuntu is interested
> in.
>

Sourceforge supports Mediawiki at least, we use that for wiki.ltsp.org 
but its permission management is a mess. They basically force every user 
to have a SF.net account and be added as "editor" by an admin.

Unless that changed, it's a major pain if we want to get contributors.

>> I already have the same sort of wiki page on opensuse.org since a year
>> ago but that's of course highly opensuse specific, which is exactly the
>> problem a central wiki proposes to avoid.
>>
>> Meanwhile I'm getting less and less in love with suse every day anyways
>> due to changes over the last couple years, and so I'm probably going to
>> start basing my systems on Arch or who-knows-what sooner or later.
>>
>> So, sourceforge or code.google.com or .. blah, lxc.org is for sale for a
>> mere $5000 haha.
>
> I'll contribute $.10 :)
>
> -serge


-- 
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to