On 10/11/2011 6:37 PM, Brian K. White wrote: > IEEE "does not honor requests" for applicant requested id's, but even > for the locally administered, > > lxc 6c:78:63 > and > LXC 4c:58:43 > > are both out. l (6c) and L (4c) both have a second nibble c which has a > second-least-significant bit 0 > > 1100 > --^- > > Too bad, it's nice and high to avoid the bridge low mac address interaction. > > > Backwards, cxl and CXL are both ok. > 43:58:4c > 63:78:6c > -^:--:-- > > 3 > 0011 > --^- > > cxl, containers by linux ? > >
lxc -> rot13 = ykp = 79:6b:70 9 1001 --^- = OK ykp? what's that? it's rot13 of lxc. Why did they go through all that rigormorole? "you know programmers" hehe LXC rot13 = YKP = 59:4b:50 = ok too -- bkw ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users