Quoting nathan w (nat...@nathanewilliams.com):
> any info on why this would be? not that this is too horrible to deal 
> with, but it is confusing to have lxc-list return empty results instead 
> of an informative message that "you may not see everything" or "need 
> more permissions". maybe i'm doing something wrong? i created these as 
> standard (sudo lxc-create -t xxxxx -n xxxxx). note that the stopped 
> containers show up without root privs (weird).
> 
> $ lxc-list
> RUNNING
> 
> STOPPED
> 
> $ sudo !!
> sudo lxc-list
> RUNNING
>    debian
>    local
> 
> STOPPED
> 
> $ sudo lxc-stop -n local
> $ lxc-list
> RUNNING
> 
> STOPPED
>    debian
>    local
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Nathan W

Usually when I've seen this sort of thing it has been because some
dir along the path of /sys/fs/cgroup/$subsys/lxc/container is not
world readable.  juju-lxc for instance sets its umask right now in a
way to cause this to happen.  Overriding umask just bc some things
don't use umask right, wouldn't be right, so fixing this in lxc is
not right.  But lxc-list/lxc-ls perhaps should explicitly warn about
this.

-serge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to