Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>wrote:
> 
> > Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> >
> >
> > Would injecting tcp rst really be necessary? In my test, doing "ip link
> > > del" on the host side of the interface ALWAYS succeed, no matter what the
> > > state the guest container's interface is.
> > >
> > > Serge, do you have the particular commit ids for
> > "lxc.network.script.down"
> > > support? Backporting that would probably be the best step for me to try.
> >
> > commit 74a2b5864f2ece87bf522d1c1cbd590dc24c0c53
> > Author: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> > Date:   Mon Jul 9 19:15:48 2012 +0200
> >
> >     Add network-down script
> >
> >
> 
> A follow up to this issue, I found out that the lxc package from
> ubuntu-lxc/stable (1.0.0~alpha2+) can't be use as-is on current LTS
> (precise) due to various issues (e.g. apparmor problem, containers detected
> as not started if started automatically on boot but behaves correctly when
> started manually, etc) which I haven't had time to track further.

ubuntu-lxc/daily fixes the autostart containers detected as not started
issue.  Might also fix your apparmor issue - I woudl assume it does
since it is what I run very heavily on my precise box.

I also never have stray veths.

-serge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to