It would really pain me to introduce a user visible option to work around a bug 
in someone else's package.  Not on my watch, as they say.  Leaving this report 
as is for now.

On 03/27/2010 02:59 AM, PCMan wrote:
> If that commit is really the cause, this should be reported as a VTE
> bug. If it cannot be fixed now, maybe we should make this behavior
> optional and let the users to turn it off if they don't want it.
> 
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Marty Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This bug
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2977128&group_id=180858&atid=894869
>>
>> complains that this commit
>>
>> http://lxde.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxde/lxterminal;a=commit;h=efb19fd64a04c9376fd8f44190ec225fe13f1f4d
>>
>> causes a severe performance degradation and would like it reverted.  
>> Comments please.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lxde-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
>>
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list

Reply via email to