On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Julien Lavergne <gi...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > Le lundi 04 octobre 2010 à 17:53 +0200, Martin Bagge / brother a écrit : >> ~/.config/pcmanfm/<profile name>-desktop-icons.conf >> >> wouldn't even be in consideration? >> > This one should not break compatibility, as it's introduced with the > desktop icons feature. +1 ! :) This is the original plan. That's why I didn't use a separate dir for each profile. However, if later we introduce plugins (if this is possible), there will be more and more config files. So every profile owns its folder seems to be a better idea. In addition, if new features are added later and they require additional config files or data files, current design is not enough. That's why I'm now considering the expansion. Previously I want to put most of the things in libfm and pcmanfm is only a frontend for it. However, later I find it's possible that pcmanfm will have some features not necessarily being part of libfm and the related config files should be in ~/.config/pcmanfm rather than ~/.config/libfm. So here is the problem. > FYI, Lubuntu is shipped with pcmanfm 0.9.X since 10.04, so it is a > problem for us if there is this type of breakage. Is it acceptable if migration from old config file is supported? I mean, to load the old file, and then write to a new place. > Regards, > Julien Lavergne
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
