Am Montag, den 04.06.2012, 14:27 +0300 schrieb Andrej N. Gritsenko: > The bug tracker at SF has two _big_ advantages: > 1) it's on the same site with the Git browser;
I'm not sure if this add much value. > 2) it's simple so easy to use for users. Sorry, but it's definitely not: People hardly ever choose a category, this means we don't know what component is affected. Because the category is not mandatory we don't have automatic notifications. Somebody needs to look over the bugs and assign them to the right components and persons. We cannot add custom fields e.g. for the version. We still have the unused "Group" field but every value we enter there is valid for all categories. We have 3 trackers: bugs, patches and feature requests. This is confusing. Groups and categories are different in all three, this means we cannot move bugs from one tracker to the other. We have the same with the pcmanfm bug tracker, which multiplies the work by factor 2. It's also very disappointing if people have to wait for weeks just to receive a message that tells them to file the bug again in another tracker. > And since we don't have army of testers who are very advanced in > knowledge of more powerful trackers last one is an issue. I agree that something like bugzilla is too powerful and confusing for most people, but the tracker of trac or the one at github for example are pretty straight forward. Kind regards, Christoph ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
