On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Stephan Sokolow <[email protected]> wrote: > It'd make sense for it to be more advanced. As I understand it, it's a > simplified frontend to JIRA and I'd be very surprised if they pared > something as featureful as JIRA down as far as GitHub Issues. > > I don't really mind BitBucket too much. It's nicer and more featureful > than Google Code, less annoying than SourceForge, and the main ways it > falls short of GitHub are things that don't apply here. > > For example, LXDE already has its own hosting, so their lack of a GitHub > Pages equivalent (last I checked) isn't an issue. > > They do apply a spam filter to even the logged-in bug tracker posts > (Akismet, I think) and that's bitten me once or twice, but it's probably > not a huge issue, and their assumption that e-mail bug replies will come > from a From: address known to their system is a weakness, but I never > trust bug replies without a preview so I don't use that anyway. > > Having the option of logging in using OpenID or using an existing GitHub > account as an OAuth provider to sign in is also a plus. > > On 13-07-26 09:30 AM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: >> *what about bitbucket *? the web interface are more light and do not >> have too many js process in background... issue tracker seems more >> avanced rather than github... >> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> What bothers me in that article is the sentence "Currently >> github is >> more favored." We all discussed that github is a temporary solution... I >> hate github really, it is very inconvenient in some aspects and their >> "issue tracker" is poor at the best. I hardly have any desire to work >> with that "issue tracker", the same way as some developers ignore the SF >> one. >> >> i really hate github and sf due the web interface, use a lot of js that >> make my browser consumes lot of memory.. and some thing do not work due >> "u need to upgrade u'r browser" rule... >> >> Well, if you go back and want github not as temporary solution >> but as >> main host for the project, I will not go agaisnt you but I will be >> set to >> find a solution for code that I work with. For GIT web interface I >> have a >> solution - I just install the GitWeb on one of my websites and will use >> >> as i said.. and then this seems a good solution if plans are use github.. >> >> it, pushing code time to time into your loved github, but github's >> "issue >> tracker" will never have my love so I will rarely come there and answer >> any questions, that will be all your job. I'm sorry. >> >> i agree >>
Bitbucket has one waek point. It's a paid service. Free users have many limitations. If we're going to use it, then we probably need some sponsor to pay for it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
