On Wednesday, 2013-08-07, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:00 AM, PCMan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 3. Should we use dconf-qt, which is done by Canonical instead, or > > using our own simple class mimicking QSettings? Personally I prefer > > our own solution and this can be included in liblxqt. > > Seeing as dconf support will ultimately end up in Qt (god knows when, > though), I recommend we use our own solution for the time being and > eventually switch to the native one. Not to forget that there is a third option: contribute an implementation to Qt upstream and then use oficial Qt API. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
