On 7 August 2013 22:05, Александр Соколов <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 1. The lxqt is better, the lxdeqt is too long. Btw, what is official
> naming, LXDEQT, LXDEQt?
> 2. lxqt.
> 3. We should to rename classes. While we porting the code, we can use
> typedef, but before release we completely get away from the razor.
> 4. The namespace is good for me, but what is namespace? LxdeQt, LXDEQt,
> LxQt or what?
>
In lxqt-settings prototype it's currently LxQt::, which I personally like -
it's really like lxqt- prefix for everything else.
Though lxqt:: namespace is good as well. (lowercase c++ style)
> 5. @Kuzma IMHO razor-global-key-shortcuts-client and
> razor-global-key-shortcut-selector is madness, let's use some like
> lxqt-shortcuts-client and lxqt-shortcuts-selector.
>
Ok. It's good time to rename them now.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexander.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
