Hi,

Jakub Kulik via lxml - The Python XML Toolkit schrieb am 14.05.26 um 12:10:
The latest version of lxml introduced _difflib.py, which is taken (as the
comment on the top suggests) from Python 3.14 sources. The file mentions no
licensing information, thus appearing BSD Licensed like the rest of lxml
sources, but since it's from Python, I presume it should be PSF licensed?
Should the PSF License be mentioned in e.g. LICENSES.txt?
Right, I'll add a note. Thanks for mentioning it.

Obviously, users of Python cannot practically object to the terms of the PSF-License, so this is mostly cosmetics for completeness…

Stefan

_______________________________________________
lxml - The Python XML Toolkit mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/lxml.python.org
Member address: [email protected]
  • [lxml] license for newly a... Jakub Kulik via lxml - The Python XML Toolkit
    • [lxml] Re: license fo... Stefan Behnel via lxml - The Python XML Toolkit

Reply via email to