On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 10:26:43AM +0000, David Woolley wrote: > > then it's not html (lynx is doing what it was designed to do, though > > that could be nicer, of course). > > And as I hinted before, IE also doesn't have proper XHTML support, even > if it has better heuristics for dealing with XHTML 1.0 which violates > appendix C but is served as text/html, and noting that appendix C already > relies on de facto universal violations of the HTML specification in > browsers. You should not serve XHTML if you want to support IE.
yes, I understood that. Reading the discussion last year about xhtml, it was apparent that your comment about fashion applied to many of the examples - it appears that some people simply put an xml tag on the beginning of the file, and it wouldn't validate under any scheme. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
