Thomas Dickey wrote: > I probably don't have time (recall that I maintain several programs). > > But to show what you're asking, I did did a quick diff between the two, > and see that the newer libwww is essentially unrelated to the older > (except superficially). > > The new code is about 87kloc: > > 87457 21501?+> total lines/statements > > while the old is more than 2/3 that: > > 59934 18202?*> total lines/statements > > and the _change_ from old/to is 80kloc's: > > 269 files changed, 80637 insertions(+), 39586 deletions(-) > > (that's after indenting the new code to the same scheme, etc). > > On a merge of that type, progress doesn't go fast - figure about a years's > work (for one person, working full time).
Don't forget the 5+ years of restabilizing its only real user (Lynx) after the merge... >Bela< _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
