Just a few thoughts.
Depending on your setup, lynx can work with paypal. not a bank, but an
example that banks need not table lynx.
The claim is always that lynx is a security risk, more so than java
focused browsers...this is what the banks claim.
additionally some banks by accident allow lynx to work via their m url.
m.nameofbank.com
but you must ask about this.
I say as much because the use of lynx should still be a reasonable
accommodations. Java is not necessary for basic banking, and of course its
use presents many issues for individuals with a number of disability
experiences.
I am still seeking one myself, and will do no on line banking with no
accessible door.
speaking of twitter for those who do it. I understand there is a very
lynx friendly program ttytwitter, <spelling> that works with twitter very
well
indeed.
Karen
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Stefan Caunter dixit:
quite unlikely. almost all banks switched to heavy javascript input
sanitation/validation after the late 90s, around the time hotmail
We had one in .de that worked, for years, with Lynx (Postbank);
they even won some accessibility price each year.
Now it’s an ugly, broken single-page js “app” using one of
the worse frameworks in existence.
I’d consider switching if I knew where to…
in a web2.0 world, lynx often becomes simply a testing tool
Luckily, not always. I attended an enlighting talk about ROCA
where the guy said to my cow-orkers to “listen to the lynx user,
he’s right” ;-)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[ Natureshadow über meine Tendenz, seine IRL-Aussprüche zu siggen ]
(er) „Du bist besser als Twitter“
(ich) „Wieso? Weil ich das Wichtige herausfiltere?“
(er) „Und weil Du einfacher zu bedienen bist“
_______________________________________________
Lynx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
_______________________________________________
Lynx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
