> No, I have no i386 system here. The only intel stuff in this system > is some of the peripherals on the motherboard, all systems in this > house are amd.
Not i386 in terms of "Intel 80386 CPU", but i386 in the sense of "same basic instruction set as Intel 80386": 32-bit x86 instruction set as opposed to the 64-bit x86 instruction set (which is what the executable is for). "uname -m" should print the architecture name your system is running under; I'm guessing you'll see "i386". I don't know whether the Athlon K8 is 64-bit capable; I'd guess not, but if so I'll further guess that you're running a 32-bit system, not a 64-bit system, and thus can't run a 64-bit binary. (You'll probably see "i386" for 32-bit and "amd64", "x86_64", or maybe "x86-64" for 64-bit.) There is some chance you'll see something else. But I am moderately confident "Athelon" is a typo for "Athlon", indicating x86 architecture, rather than a name for an ARM variant or some such. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list Lynx-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
