Hi Thomas, On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 12:59:55PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > | yes - if it were something that I could reproduce, I'd be checking that. > | But "hppa" (HP PA-RISC, I guess) is out of my reach.
Correct. > | (aside from suggesting that they turn off optimization, no help) > > Between the last-successful and first-failed builds, gcc is updated: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lynx&arch=hppa&ver=2.9.0dev.9-2&stamp=1629041931&raw=0 > > checking version of gcc... 10.2.1 > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lynx&arch=hppa&ver=2.9.0dev.10-1&stamp=1635443140&raw=0 > > checking version of gcc... 11.2.0 Of course that could have made an difference, too. Will build 2.9.0dev.9 with GCC 11 on HPPA and 2.9.0dev.10 with GCC 10 on HPPA and will report back which of thebuilds failed. Kind regards, Axel -- PGP: 2FF9CD59612616B5 /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign, http://arc.pasp.de/ Mail: [email protected] \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and Usenet Mail+Jabber: [email protected] X https://axel.beckert.ch/ / \ I love long mails: https://email.is-not-s.ms/
