>> Since these levels share parsing code, consider this already done.   ;-)

> But it isn't already done, in your patch, as far as I could see.

Umm?  What is not done?  Sharing parsing?  It is there for quite some time.

> I revise my statement:
>   Using .lynx-keymaps shouldn't be encouraged.

As far as a functionality to redefine keyseqs is present, I will not argue.

> Use termcap / terminfo / infocmp / tic instead.  T

I'm not sure you know what you are talking about.  How do I specify
Control-Meta-Pageup in terminfo?  How do I go over the shameful limits
on the size of terminfo entries (put for compatibility with termcap? -
maybe).

Ilya

Reply via email to