From: Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
991119 Klaus Weide wrote:
>>PW> a good point, provided it is documented somewhere,
>>PW> but it isn't: not in Users Guide or Supported URLs.
>KW> let the inventor of LYNXCFG: do it... :)
PW>yes, if we all accept that authors of features & their modifications
PW>should be required to document them (allowing for language difficulties),
PW>but i hesitate to ask TD to take on the task of doing the requiring.
Tom, I won't hesitate to at least _ask_ your opinion - what do you
think about the idea that before a new or changed feature is accepted
requiring the contributor also provide documentation?
--
Larry W. Virden <URL: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/> <*> O-
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
-><-
